Review



hep56 1d  (CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH)


Bioz Verified Symbol CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH hep56 1d
    Dose–response curves were generated to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of increasing concentrations of sorafenib (SF) and SR9009 (SR) in Hep55.1 C ( a ) <t>and</t> <t>Hep56.1D</t> ( b ) hepatoma cells. When administered as a single agent, SR9009 exhibited cytotoxicity only at high concentrations (IC₅₀ = 47.1 µM in Hep55.1C and IC₅₀ = 730.5 µM in Hep56.1D cells). Drug combination studies were performed using increasing concentrations of sorafenib in the presence of a fixed dose of SR9009 (12.5 µM). After 48 h of treatment, a pronounced synergistic effect on cell viability was observed, with a marked reduction in sorafenib IC₅₀ values (from 12 µM to 6 µM in Hep55.1C and from 10 µM to 6 µM in Hep56.1D), and a detectable cytotoxic response even at submicromolar sorafenib concentrations (<1 µM). In contrast, in normal baby mouse kidney fibroblasts (BMK) ( c ), low concentrations of SR9009 slightly improved cell growth and viability, while cytotoxic effects were evident only at high doses (>100 µM). When combined with SR9009 (12.5 µM), sorafenib showed only a modest reduction in IC₅₀ (from 14 µM to 10 µM), with no evidence of synergistic cytotoxicity at lower concentrations. Cell viability values were normalized to untreated controls. Drug concentrations are expressed on a log₁₀ scale. Data points represent mean cell viability ± SD for each concentration.
    Hep56 1d, supplied by CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hep+56+1d/pmc12877144-192-4-16?v=CLS+Cell+Lines+Service+GmbH
    Average 93 stars, based on 5 article reviews
    hep56 1d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Targeting metabolic vulnerabilities: REV-ERB agonist SR9009 potentiates sorafenib efficacy in liver cancer"

    Article Title: Targeting metabolic vulnerabilities: REV-ERB agonist SR9009 potentiates sorafenib efficacy in liver cancer

    Journal: Cell Death Discovery

    doi: 10.1038/s41420-026-02940-3

    Dose–response curves were generated to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of increasing concentrations of sorafenib (SF) and SR9009 (SR) in Hep55.1 C ( a ) and Hep56.1D ( b ) hepatoma cells. When administered as a single agent, SR9009 exhibited cytotoxicity only at high concentrations (IC₅₀ = 47.1 µM in Hep55.1C and IC₅₀ = 730.5 µM in Hep56.1D cells). Drug combination studies were performed using increasing concentrations of sorafenib in the presence of a fixed dose of SR9009 (12.5 µM). After 48 h of treatment, a pronounced synergistic effect on cell viability was observed, with a marked reduction in sorafenib IC₅₀ values (from 12 µM to 6 µM in Hep55.1C and from 10 µM to 6 µM in Hep56.1D), and a detectable cytotoxic response even at submicromolar sorafenib concentrations (<1 µM). In contrast, in normal baby mouse kidney fibroblasts (BMK) ( c ), low concentrations of SR9009 slightly improved cell growth and viability, while cytotoxic effects were evident only at high doses (>100 µM). When combined with SR9009 (12.5 µM), sorafenib showed only a modest reduction in IC₅₀ (from 14 µM to 10 µM), with no evidence of synergistic cytotoxicity at lower concentrations. Cell viability values were normalized to untreated controls. Drug concentrations are expressed on a log₁₀ scale. Data points represent mean cell viability ± SD for each concentration.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Dose–response curves were generated to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of increasing concentrations of sorafenib (SF) and SR9009 (SR) in Hep55.1 C ( a ) and Hep56.1D ( b ) hepatoma cells. When administered as a single agent, SR9009 exhibited cytotoxicity only at high concentrations (IC₅₀ = 47.1 µM in Hep55.1C and IC₅₀ = 730.5 µM in Hep56.1D cells). Drug combination studies were performed using increasing concentrations of sorafenib in the presence of a fixed dose of SR9009 (12.5 µM). After 48 h of treatment, a pronounced synergistic effect on cell viability was observed, with a marked reduction in sorafenib IC₅₀ values (from 12 µM to 6 µM in Hep55.1C and from 10 µM to 6 µM in Hep56.1D), and a detectable cytotoxic response even at submicromolar sorafenib concentrations (<1 µM). In contrast, in normal baby mouse kidney fibroblasts (BMK) ( c ), low concentrations of SR9009 slightly improved cell growth and viability, while cytotoxic effects were evident only at high doses (>100 µM). When combined with SR9009 (12.5 µM), sorafenib showed only a modest reduction in IC₅₀ (from 14 µM to 10 µM), with no evidence of synergistic cytotoxicity at lower concentrations. Cell viability values were normalized to untreated controls. Drug concentrations are expressed on a log₁₀ scale. Data points represent mean cell viability ± SD for each concentration.

    Techniques Used: Generated, Concentration Assay



    Similar Products

    93
    CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH hep56 1d
    Dose–response curves were generated to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of increasing concentrations of sorafenib (SF) and SR9009 (SR) in Hep55.1 C ( a ) <t>and</t> <t>Hep56.1D</t> ( b ) hepatoma cells. When administered as a single agent, SR9009 exhibited cytotoxicity only at high concentrations (IC₅₀ = 47.1 µM in Hep55.1C and IC₅₀ = 730.5 µM in Hep56.1D cells). Drug combination studies were performed using increasing concentrations of sorafenib in the presence of a fixed dose of SR9009 (12.5 µM). After 48 h of treatment, a pronounced synergistic effect on cell viability was observed, with a marked reduction in sorafenib IC₅₀ values (from 12 µM to 6 µM in Hep55.1C and from 10 µM to 6 µM in Hep56.1D), and a detectable cytotoxic response even at submicromolar sorafenib concentrations (<1 µM). In contrast, in normal baby mouse kidney fibroblasts (BMK) ( c ), low concentrations of SR9009 slightly improved cell growth and viability, while cytotoxic effects were evident only at high doses (>100 µM). When combined with SR9009 (12.5 µM), sorafenib showed only a modest reduction in IC₅₀ (from 14 µM to 10 µM), with no evidence of synergistic cytotoxicity at lower concentrations. Cell viability values were normalized to untreated controls. Drug concentrations are expressed on a log₁₀ scale. Data points represent mean cell viability ± SD for each concentration.
    Hep56 1d, supplied by CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hep+56+1d/pmc12877144-192-4-16?v=CLS+Cell+Lines+Service+GmbH
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hep56 1d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH hep 56 1d
    Dose–response curves were generated to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of increasing concentrations of sorafenib (SF) and SR9009 (SR) in Hep55.1 C ( a ) <t>and</t> <t>Hep56.1D</t> ( b ) hepatoma cells. When administered as a single agent, SR9009 exhibited cytotoxicity only at high concentrations (IC₅₀ = 47.1 µM in Hep55.1C and IC₅₀ = 730.5 µM in Hep56.1D cells). Drug combination studies were performed using increasing concentrations of sorafenib in the presence of a fixed dose of SR9009 (12.5 µM). After 48 h of treatment, a pronounced synergistic effect on cell viability was observed, with a marked reduction in sorafenib IC₅₀ values (from 12 µM to 6 µM in Hep55.1C and from 10 µM to 6 µM in Hep56.1D), and a detectable cytotoxic response even at submicromolar sorafenib concentrations (<1 µM). In contrast, in normal baby mouse kidney fibroblasts (BMK) ( c ), low concentrations of SR9009 slightly improved cell growth and viability, while cytotoxic effects were evident only at high doses (>100 µM). When combined with SR9009 (12.5 µM), sorafenib showed only a modest reduction in IC₅₀ (from 14 µM to 10 µM), with no evidence of synergistic cytotoxicity at lower concentrations. Cell viability values were normalized to untreated controls. Drug concentrations are expressed on a log₁₀ scale. Data points represent mean cell viability ± SD for each concentration.
    Hep 56 1d, supplied by CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hep+56+1d/pmc12282914-67-0-6?v=CLS+Cell+Lines+Service+GmbH
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hep 56 1d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH hep56 1 d cells
    ( A ) Schematic of the engineered murine hepatoma cell line, Clone 8 + murine ApoE (mApoE) derived <t>from</t> <t>Hep56.1D</t> cells. ( B ) SEC14L2 expression verified by western blot. Mouse anti-human SEC14L2 shown in green (~45 kDa) and rabbit anti-β actin shown in red (~42 kDa). ( C ) miR-122 expression was assessed by RT-qPCR. Results are normalized to U6 and shown as fold change relative to Huh7.5 cells (set at 100). ( D ) Clone 8 ± ApoE express human CD81, Venus YFP-human OCLN, Cerulean-human CLDN1, mKate2-human SRBI and murine ApoE-tagRFP as assessed by flow cytometry. ( E ) The kinetics of HCV replication were assessed in Clone 8 ± ApoE, the parental Hep56.1D cells and the highly permissive human hepatoma cell line Huh7. Cells were infected with Jc1-Gluc at an MOI of 0.1 and supernatants collected daily for six days. On even-numbered days as indicated by the labeled arrows, cells were washed with PBS and the media changed to assess de novo replication. Lines and error bars represent the mean ± SD.
    Hep56 1 D Cells, supplied by CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hep+56+1d/pmc06510530-273-12-15?v=CLS+Cell+Lines+Service+GmbH
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hep56 1 d cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH hep56 1d mouse hepatocellular carcinoma cells
    ( A ) Schematic of the engineered murine hepatoma cell line, Clone 8 + murine ApoE (mApoE) derived <t>from</t> <t>Hep56.1D</t> cells. ( B ) SEC14L2 expression verified by western blot. Mouse anti-human SEC14L2 shown in green (~45 kDa) and rabbit anti-β actin shown in red (~42 kDa). ( C ) miR-122 expression was assessed by RT-qPCR. Results are normalized to U6 and shown as fold change relative to Huh7.5 cells (set at 100). ( D ) Clone 8 ± ApoE express human CD81, Venus YFP-human OCLN, Cerulean-human CLDN1, mKate2-human SRBI and murine ApoE-tagRFP as assessed by flow cytometry. ( E ) The kinetics of HCV replication were assessed in Clone 8 ± ApoE, the parental Hep56.1D cells and the highly permissive human hepatoma cell line Huh7. Cells were infected with Jc1-Gluc at an MOI of 0.1 and supernatants collected daily for six days. On even-numbered days as indicated by the labeled arrows, cells were washed with PBS and the media changed to assess de novo replication. Lines and error bars represent the mean ± SD.
    Hep56 1d Mouse Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells, supplied by CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hep+56+1d/pm29378327-217-0-5?v=CLS+Cell+Lines+Service+GmbH
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hep56 1d mouse hepatocellular carcinoma cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH mh274
    ( A ) Schematic of the engineered murine hepatoma cell line, Clone 8 + murine ApoE (mApoE) derived <t>from</t> <t>Hep56.1D</t> cells. ( B ) SEC14L2 expression verified by western blot. Mouse anti-human SEC14L2 shown in green (~45 kDa) and rabbit anti-β actin shown in red (~42 kDa). ( C ) miR-122 expression was assessed by RT-qPCR. Results are normalized to U6 and shown as fold change relative to Huh7.5 cells (set at 100). ( D ) Clone 8 ± ApoE express human CD81, Venus YFP-human OCLN, Cerulean-human CLDN1, mKate2-human SRBI and murine ApoE-tagRFP as assessed by flow cytometry. ( E ) The kinetics of HCV replication were assessed in Clone 8 ± ApoE, the parental Hep56.1D cells and the highly permissive human hepatoma cell line Huh7. Cells were infected with Jc1-Gluc at an MOI of 0.1 and supernatants collected daily for six days. On even-numbered days as indicated by the labeled arrows, cells were washed with PBS and the media changed to assess de novo replication. Lines and error bars represent the mean ± SD.
    Mh274, supplied by CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/hep+56+1d/pm26576481-239-182-180?v=CLS+Cell+Lines+Service+GmbH
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mh274 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Dose–response curves were generated to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of increasing concentrations of sorafenib (SF) and SR9009 (SR) in Hep55.1 C ( a ) and Hep56.1D ( b ) hepatoma cells. When administered as a single agent, SR9009 exhibited cytotoxicity only at high concentrations (IC₅₀ = 47.1 µM in Hep55.1C and IC₅₀ = 730.5 µM in Hep56.1D cells). Drug combination studies were performed using increasing concentrations of sorafenib in the presence of a fixed dose of SR9009 (12.5 µM). After 48 h of treatment, a pronounced synergistic effect on cell viability was observed, with a marked reduction in sorafenib IC₅₀ values (from 12 µM to 6 µM in Hep55.1C and from 10 µM to 6 µM in Hep56.1D), and a detectable cytotoxic response even at submicromolar sorafenib concentrations (<1 µM). In contrast, in normal baby mouse kidney fibroblasts (BMK) ( c ), low concentrations of SR9009 slightly improved cell growth and viability, while cytotoxic effects were evident only at high doses (>100 µM). When combined with SR9009 (12.5 µM), sorafenib showed only a modest reduction in IC₅₀ (from 14 µM to 10 µM), with no evidence of synergistic cytotoxicity at lower concentrations. Cell viability values were normalized to untreated controls. Drug concentrations are expressed on a log₁₀ scale. Data points represent mean cell viability ± SD for each concentration.

    Journal: Cell Death Discovery

    Article Title: Targeting metabolic vulnerabilities: REV-ERB agonist SR9009 potentiates sorafenib efficacy in liver cancer

    doi: 10.1038/s41420-026-02940-3

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Dose–response curves were generated to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of increasing concentrations of sorafenib (SF) and SR9009 (SR) in Hep55.1 C ( a ) and Hep56.1D ( b ) hepatoma cells. When administered as a single agent, SR9009 exhibited cytotoxicity only at high concentrations (IC₅₀ = 47.1 µM in Hep55.1C and IC₅₀ = 730.5 µM in Hep56.1D cells). Drug combination studies were performed using increasing concentrations of sorafenib in the presence of a fixed dose of SR9009 (12.5 µM). After 48 h of treatment, a pronounced synergistic effect on cell viability was observed, with a marked reduction in sorafenib IC₅₀ values (from 12 µM to 6 µM in Hep55.1C and from 10 µM to 6 µM in Hep56.1D), and a detectable cytotoxic response even at submicromolar sorafenib concentrations (<1 µM). In contrast, in normal baby mouse kidney fibroblasts (BMK) ( c ), low concentrations of SR9009 slightly improved cell growth and viability, while cytotoxic effects were evident only at high doses (>100 µM). When combined with SR9009 (12.5 µM), sorafenib showed only a modest reduction in IC₅₀ (from 14 µM to 10 µM), with no evidence of synergistic cytotoxicity at lower concentrations. Cell viability values were normalized to untreated controls. Drug concentrations are expressed on a log₁₀ scale. Data points represent mean cell viability ± SD for each concentration.

    Article Snippet: Murine Hep55.1C (440201) and Hep56.1D (440204) cells, obtained from hepatomas of C57BL/6J mice, were obtained from CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, Germany.

    Techniques: Generated, Concentration Assay

    ( A ) Schematic of the engineered murine hepatoma cell line, Clone 8 + murine ApoE (mApoE) derived from Hep56.1D cells. ( B ) SEC14L2 expression verified by western blot. Mouse anti-human SEC14L2 shown in green (~45 kDa) and rabbit anti-β actin shown in red (~42 kDa). ( C ) miR-122 expression was assessed by RT-qPCR. Results are normalized to U6 and shown as fold change relative to Huh7.5 cells (set at 100). ( D ) Clone 8 ± ApoE express human CD81, Venus YFP-human OCLN, Cerulean-human CLDN1, mKate2-human SRBI and murine ApoE-tagRFP as assessed by flow cytometry. ( E ) The kinetics of HCV replication were assessed in Clone 8 ± ApoE, the parental Hep56.1D cells and the highly permissive human hepatoma cell line Huh7. Cells were infected with Jc1-Gluc at an MOI of 0.1 and supernatants collected daily for six days. On even-numbered days as indicated by the labeled arrows, cells were washed with PBS and the media changed to assess de novo replication. Lines and error bars represent the mean ± SD.

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Differences across cyclophilin A orthologs contribute to the host range restriction of hepatitis C virus

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.44436

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic of the engineered murine hepatoma cell line, Clone 8 + murine ApoE (mApoE) derived from Hep56.1D cells. ( B ) SEC14L2 expression verified by western blot. Mouse anti-human SEC14L2 shown in green (~45 kDa) and rabbit anti-β actin shown in red (~42 kDa). ( C ) miR-122 expression was assessed by RT-qPCR. Results are normalized to U6 and shown as fold change relative to Huh7.5 cells (set at 100). ( D ) Clone 8 ± ApoE express human CD81, Venus YFP-human OCLN, Cerulean-human CLDN1, mKate2-human SRBI and murine ApoE-tagRFP as assessed by flow cytometry. ( E ) The kinetics of HCV replication were assessed in Clone 8 ± ApoE, the parental Hep56.1D cells and the highly permissive human hepatoma cell line Huh7. Cells were infected with Jc1-Gluc at an MOI of 0.1 and supernatants collected daily for six days. On even-numbered days as indicated by the labeled arrows, cells were washed with PBS and the media changed to assess de novo replication. Lines and error bars represent the mean ± SD.

    Article Snippet: Huh7 cells were obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC) and Hep56.1D cells from CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH (Eppelheim, Germany).

    Techniques: Derivative Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Flow Cytometry, Infection, Labeling

    ( A ) Clone 8 + ApoE cells were transduced with mouse, human, triply murinized human, or triply humanized mouse CypA in bicistronic lentiviral constructs expressing eGFP. Transduction efficiency assessed by flow cytometry. ( B ) The transduced Clone 8 cells were infected with Jc1-Gluc (MOI = 0.1) and the media changed daily. The different factors transduced into the Hep56.1D cells are specified below the graph. Note that the

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Differences across cyclophilin A orthologs contribute to the host range restriction of hepatitis C virus

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.44436

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Clone 8 + ApoE cells were transduced with mouse, human, triply murinized human, or triply humanized mouse CypA in bicistronic lentiviral constructs expressing eGFP. Transduction efficiency assessed by flow cytometry. ( B ) The transduced Clone 8 cells were infected with Jc1-Gluc (MOI = 0.1) and the media changed daily. The different factors transduced into the Hep56.1D cells are specified below the graph. Note that the "—*” for mApoE indicates that these cells were not transduced to express exogenous mApoE; their endogenous expression was not disrupted. Results shown are from two representative experiments, each with triplicate samples. Gaussia luciferase activity was assessed in these supernatants as a proxy for HCV replication and is expressed as relative luminescence units (RLU). Ordinary one-way ANOVA test performed on the Hep56.1D and derivative lines followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test with a single pooled variance. The dashed line labeled ‘background’ is the average signal from supernatants of naïve cells. ( C ) As in ( B ), Huh7 cells, Hep56.1D and derivative lines as shown on the x-axis were infected with Jc1-Gluc (MOI = 0.1) and supernatants collected at six dpi to infect naïve Huh7.5 cells. Following infection of these Huh7.5 cells with the supernatants, the media was changed daily. Shown is the Gaussia luciferase activity of the Huh7.5 supernatants three dpi with the origin of the supernatants used for the original infection indicated on the X axis. Lines and error bars represent the mean ± SD. The dashed line labeled ‘background’ is the average signal from supernatants of naïve cells. Ordinary two-way ANOVA test performed on the Hep56.1D and derivative lines followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, with all means compared to that of Hep56.1D. Lines and error bars represent the mean ± SD. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Huh7 cells were obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC) and Hep56.1D cells from CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH (Eppelheim, Germany).

    Techniques: Transduction, Construct, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Infection, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Labeling, Comparison

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Differences across cyclophilin A orthologs contribute to the host range restriction of hepatitis C virus

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.44436

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Huh7 cells were obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC) and Hep56.1D cells from CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH (Eppelheim, Germany).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, shRNA, Cloning, Mutagenesis, Luciferase, Recombinant, Plasmid Preparation, Sequencing, Software